April 5, 2007

Spring is a Good Time to Bone up on Florida Premises Liability Laws

Usually, weather is not a very exciting topic, but today it is all that residents of New England have to talk about. Maine and other parts of the east coast have been hit with freezing temperatures and even snow. Florida is seeing thunderstorms and showers. Some forecasters are predicting that some Northern parts of Florida may be affected by cold temperatures or even freezing before the system moves out.

Snow and rain may be part of spring in various parts of the country, but Florida property owners need to be aware that weather conditions can lead to Florida premises liability claims. Each year, Florida attorneys see legal claims launched after someone is injured in a slip and fall accident or other accident on a property that is not properly maintained.

The truth is, Florida has a number of weather features that create the possibility of accidents and personal injury. Fog, rain, and showers are not uncommon in the region. Florida is not even a stranger to snow. The mid-1970s saw a number of cold snaps and even snowy conditions in 1977. Some Florida residents saw snow on Christmas day in 1989. While Southern Florida attorneys and their clients rarely have to put up with snow, all extreme weather conditions can create dangerous conditions that lead to accidents.

Florida property owners need to be aware of the weather and need to act to ensure that their properties are safe for home dwellers and for visitors. While homeowners are certainly not expected to control the weather or react instantly to bad weather, known hazards on a property can easily lead to a premises liability claim in bad weather.

If a property owner knows about a poorly lit walk, a leaky roof, or other problem and fails to fix it, bad weather can lead to serious problems. Not maintaining a property or not taking reasonable steps to prevent accidents can lead to a claim, and owners need to be aware that claims are more likely to be made after poor weather. For example, if a roof gable has been leaky for some time it may create puddles on a sidewalk after a rain. If a visitor slips and falls on a sidewalk and can prove that the owner knew about the gable but refused to fix it, that injured party can be entitled to damages under the law.

Continue reading "Spring is a Good Time to Bone up on Florida Premises Liability Laws" »

Bookmark: Bookmark Spring%20is%20a%20Good%20Time%20to%20Bone%20up%20on%20Florida%20Premises%20Liability%20Laws at Google.com Bookmark Spring%20is%20a%20Good%20Time%20to%20Bone%20up%20on%20Florida%20Premises%20Liability%20Laws at del.icio.us Digg Spring%20is%20a%20Good%20Time%20to%20Bone%20up%20on%20Florida%20Premises%20Liability%20Laws at Digg.com Bookmark Spring%20is%20a%20Good%20Time%20to%20Bone%20up%20on%20Florida%20Premises%20Liability%20Laws at Spurl.net Bookmark Spring%20is%20a%20Good%20Time%20to%20Bone%20up%20on%20Florida%20Premises%20Liability%20Laws at Simpy.com Bookmark Spring%20is%20a%20Good%20Time%20to%20Bone%20up%20on%20Florida%20Premises%20Liability%20Laws at NewsVine Blink this Spring%20is%20a%20Good%20Time%20to%20Bone%20up%20on%20Florida%20Premises%20Liability%20Laws at blinklist.com Bookmark Spring%20is%20a%20Good%20Time%20to%20Bone%20up%20on%20Florida%20Premises%20Liability%20Laws at Furl.net Bookmark Spring%20is%20a%20Good%20Time%20to%20Bone%20up%20on%20Florida%20Premises%20Liability%20Laws at reddit.com Fark Spring%20is%20a%20Good%20Time%20to%20Bone%20up%20on%20Florida%20Premises%20Liability%20Laws at Fark.com Bookmark Spring%20is%20a%20Good%20Time%20to%20Bone%20up%20on%20Florida%20Premises%20Liability%20Laws at Yahoo! MyWeb

February 13, 2007

Unusual Premises Liability Case to Change Definitions of “Premises”?

Most premises liability cases have to do with a specific location or premises. These cases are an issue when someone slips or becomes injured on another person’s property. A new case may take the definition of premises liability into cyberspace, however. A round of lawsuits filed in late January 2007 against social networking MySpace allege that the site failed to protect minors. Four families are suing the company, alleging their daughters were sexually assaulted after meeting men they had first encountered through MySpace. Attorneys representing the families claim that MySpace did not add security measures to the site, making minors vulnerable.

The website, owned by parent company News Corp., did eventually add some security features after widespread criticism that the site was doing nothing to protect minors. These security measures came too late, claim the victims’ families. In fact, the latest security features for MySpace – including a software program called Zephyr – were only released the same week the lawsuits were filed.

Experts in technology law have pointed out that message boards and social networking sites are not in fact required by law to have security features and in fact there are no laws governing the ways that these sites should operate. User agreements do ban specific illegal activities from sites, but each site is allowed to decide for itself how specific illegal activities will be stopped.

Another issue, claim technology experts, is how a large site such as MySpace can monitor and halt potentially illegal activity. Websites can use age verification and access controls, but these can always be circumvented by users. As many legal professionals have pointed out, web sites are not required by law to moderate their web sites, and doing so poses serious logistic challenges, especially on websites with heavy traffic.

Another challenge in the lawsuits will have to do with a lack of precedence. There simply have not been many previous cases like the one against MySpace, and that could make the families’ battle more difficult. In addition, a 2001 Florida's Supreme Court ruling could be an issue. The 2001 ruling found that in line with the U.S. Communications Decency Act of 1996, AOL was not liable for not policing chat rooms.

What is interesting about the MySpace case is that it is expected that the plaintiffs will opt for a "premises liability" argument. Although a web site is not usually considered a location or premises as such, creating this sort of argument allows the plaintiffs to argue that MySpace did not take adequate care to prevent foreseeable illegal acts.

Bookmark: Bookmark Unusual%20Premises%20Liability%20Case%20to%20Change%20Definitions%20of%20%E2%80%9CPremises%E2%80%9D%3F at Google.com Bookmark Unusual%20Premises%20Liability%20Case%20to%20Change%20Definitions%20of%20%E2%80%9CPremises%E2%80%9D%3F at del.icio.us Digg Unusual%20Premises%20Liability%20Case%20to%20Change%20Definitions%20of%20%E2%80%9CPremises%E2%80%9D%3F at Digg.com Bookmark Unusual%20Premises%20Liability%20Case%20to%20Change%20Definitions%20of%20%E2%80%9CPremises%E2%80%9D%3F at Spurl.net Bookmark Unusual%20Premises%20Liability%20Case%20to%20Change%20Definitions%20of%20%E2%80%9CPremises%E2%80%9D%3F at Simpy.com Bookmark Unusual%20Premises%20Liability%20Case%20to%20Change%20Definitions%20of%20%E2%80%9CPremises%E2%80%9D%3F at NewsVine Blink this Unusual%20Premises%20Liability%20Case%20to%20Change%20Definitions%20of%20%E2%80%9CPremises%E2%80%9D%3F at blinklist.com Bookmark Unusual%20Premises%20Liability%20Case%20to%20Change%20Definitions%20of%20%E2%80%9CPremises%E2%80%9D%3F at Furl.net Bookmark Unusual%20Premises%20Liability%20Case%20to%20Change%20Definitions%20of%20%E2%80%9CPremises%E2%80%9D%3F at reddit.com Fark Unusual%20Premises%20Liability%20Case%20to%20Change%20Definitions%20of%20%E2%80%9CPremises%E2%80%9D%3F at Fark.com Bookmark Unusual%20Premises%20Liability%20Case%20to%20Change%20Definitions%20of%20%E2%80%9CPremises%E2%80%9D%3F at Yahoo! MyWeb