Published on:

Pet Food Company May Face Legal Action From Pet Owners

Florida attorneys – and, in fact, lawyers from across the country – expect that the recent massive recall of pet food produced by Canadian-owned Menu Foods will generate many lawsuits. Florida attorneys specializing in product liability cases expect that any state residents who have had a pet injured as a result of pet food will join in a class action lawsuit against the company.

Menu Foods started receiving complaints on February 20 that dogs and cats consuming their products seemed to be experiencing kidney failure. When the company ran tests on the foods they produced and found that 1 in 6 animals died during the tests after eating the pet food. After the tests, and three weeks after the complaints, Menu Foods launched a massive recall. More than 90 popular brands of pet food were recalled by the pet food giant. Many of the `cuts and gravy’ style dog and cat food sold in North America were affected by the recall.

After the recall, it quickly became apparent that the pet deaths appeared to stem from some sort of contamination of the pet food. At first, federal investigators trying to pinpoint the exact cause of the contamination focused on protein filler wheat gluten. Eventually, however, it was determined that trace amounts of aminopterin, a rat poison banned in the US, was the contaminant. How the banned substance got into the pet food is currently under investigation. However, the fact that the substance is banned in the US and does not belong in any way in pet food products may further fuel lawsuits by pet owners.

Another controversy swirling around Menu Foods has to do with exactly how many pets have been affected by the tainted pet food. The company has officially only confirmed 16 deaths related to the pet food so far, although company representatives acknowledge that more pets may die in upcoming weeks as a result of the food. However, US-based website Veterinary Information Network has reported at least 471 cases of kidney failure among pets in the past 10 days alone. The website founder claims that the number of pets that could be affected in the coming weeks could number in the tens of thousands.

Kidney failure in dogs and cats gives the animals only slim chances of survival and treatment for the pets is costly. Florida attorneys expect that pet owners will be able to sue Menu Foods not only for vet bills and what the pet owners paid for the animal, but also potentially for sentimental values. Some pet owners are claiming that Menu Foods’ slow response to a possible danger as well as the actual cause of contamination show a recklessness or willful disregard, but it will ultimately be up to a court to determine how much Menu Foods is liable for the problem.

Client Reviews
★★★★★
Mr. Flaxman is highly skilled and very pleasant to work with. He communicated with me at every step in the process, and clearly presented information relating to my case. To anyone considering retaining his firm, I highly recommend him. Clara Barman
★★★★★
THE BEST. Honest, very knowledgeable, fast and easy. has helped me in numerous situations and has never failed me. Joe Gee
★★★★★
Charlie is a very skilled attorney that advocates hard for his clients. But the best part is he is an all around great guy. He cares about helping and doing what is right for people and his community. And he is not afraid to fight against those who do wrong or against threats to our world. He is fluent in Spanish as well. Do yourself a favor and call him. Andy
★★★★★
I had a lawyer on another case and I never spoke to the lawyer and I hated that I never knew what was going on in my case. Mr. Flaxman was in constant communication with me, explained everything to me, and his staff was really great too. My phone calls were always returned immediately. It was refreshing to be able to speak to my attorney personally. I would HIGHLY recommend Mr. Flaxman as an attorney to anyone who has been in an accident. Gloria
★★★★★
I found Mr. Flaxman to be an excellent attorney for my personal injury case. This is actually the second time I have used him and he really represented my interests. He explained everything thoroughly and he was very available for my questions. Carol
Contact Information